Jack Rogers,
Jesus, the Bible and Homosexuality: Explode the Myths, Heal the Church. Louisville, Kentucky: Westminster John Knox Press, 2006. Pp.169. £8.92.
Edited by Duncan Dormer and Jeremy Morris,
An Acceptable Sacrifice? Homosexuality and the Church. London: SPCK, 2007. Pp.179. £12.99.
Giles Fraser,
Christianity with Attitude. Norwich: The Canterbury Press, 2007. Pp.176. £9.99.
Reviewed by Robert Thompson
Much media coverage of religious issues tends to resort to using the simplistic categories of ‘liberal' and ‘conservative'. This is very much the case in presentations of the ‘debate' in the Anglican Communion on issues of human sexuality. This crude dualistic reductionism masks a more complex contemporary theological reality in which positions formed on any particular issue have a much more varied provenance. This is very much exemplified by these three recent publications.
John Rogers, of ‘conservative' evangelical stock (p.6; also John Rogers, Confessions of a Conservative Evangelical , 2002), is a former Moderator of the Presbyterian Church (USA) who writes with the desire that his own denomination's wounds of division over human sexuality should be healed. ...
In contrast the offering of a set of generally ‘liberally' minded Cambridge based Church of England theologians to the current sexuality ‘debate' in an Anglican context: An Acceptable Sacrifice? Homosexuality and the Church is thoroughly disappointing.
Real bodies are, however, the primary subject for theological reflection on virtually every page of Giles Fraser's Christianity with Attitude. This book gathers together some of Fraser's best journalistic contributions to The Church Times , The Guardian and Thought for the Day and rearranges them in thematically. There are sections covering the liturgical year, death, the ‘bloody church', fundamentalism, sex and individualism. What is impressive about Fraser's journalism is that, for the most part, he makes passionate, insightful and memorable theological points which combine the personal, the philosophical and the political without resorting to trite sound bites.
Full review: Word .pdf