The Covenant and sex
The Covenant pages -
previous •
next
It was the Windsor Report which first proposed an Anglican
Covenant, in response to two controversial events in 2003: the provision of a
blessing service for same-sex partnerships by the Diocese of New Westminster,
Canada, and the election of a partnered gay priest, Gene Robinson, to the post
of Bishop of New Hampshire.
The idea of such a Covenant was therefore the brainchild
of those who not only disapproved of same-sex partnerships, but also considered
threats of schism justifiable. Today Covenant supporters still frequently refer
to the North American actions as the cause of these threats, thus revealing
that the desire for the Covenant is still being driven by hostility to same-sex
partnerships. So, for example, writes
Alyson Barnett-Cowan. There is abundant evidence that many Covenant supporters are
looking forward to lodging formal objections to the churches of the USA and Canada.
Nevertheless the Covenant itself does not mention
sexuality issues. If it comes into force the procedure it offers to those
objecting to same-sex partnerships would be equally available to others:
perhaps opponents of evolution or interfaith dialogue will appeal to the
Standing Committee to establish a 'resolution' in their favour. We can only
guess at the future issues.
Savitri Hensman has written an
82-page document on the Covenant from the perspective of gays and lesbians.
Other pages on this website:
The Covenant pages -
previous •
next